Nairobi/Dadaab (Kenya) - Human rights groups are warning that
Kenya's controversial Security Amendment Act still poses a threat to refugees'
rights despite a high court decision on Friday that suspends parts of the bill
for 30 days pending a full court hearing.
AFRICA
NEWS UPDATE (ANU)
Africa News Update offers news, background and feature articles
from African sources two times a week. The newsletter is free of charge and is
edited by the Norwegian Council for Africa. Some of the articles may be
shortened.
OTHER
STORIES ON KENYA:
Kenya:
Charlie Hebdo tragedy shows limits of satire
The past week’s news has been dominated by the attack on Charlie
Hebdo, the leftist and satirical... Read
more >
Kenya:
Defence forces must review Somalia strategy to tackle Al Shabaab
Al-Shabaab strikes again. With the security services seemingly
unable to protect Kenyans, it is t... Read
more >
Kenya:
ICC focus shifts as it drops charges against President Kenyatta
Nairobi (Kenya) - The withdrawal of charges of crimes against
humanity facing Kenya’s President U... Read
more >
Kenya:
Is singer Bob Geldof a tone-deaf investor?
Nairobi (Kenya) - Time for a rock star update! Bob Geldof had
run around a bit at conferences ber... Read
more >
The suspension included a
section of the wide-ranging bill, popularly known as the ‘anti-terror’ law,
that amended Kenya's Refugees Act. The amendment stipulates that, "the
number of refugees and asylum seekers permitted to stay in Kenya shall not
exceed 150,000."
Currently there are over 600,000 refugees, asylum seekers and
stateless people living in Kenya, according to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR).
Although the cap of 150,000 can be reset by the National
Assembly, rights groups fear that the new amendment will result in large
numbers of refugees being forcibly returned. This would amount to refoulement,
a serious contravention of international refugee law.
On Friday, the Judge ruled that other sections of the new act
that deal with refugees will remain in place including a requirement that
anyone who has applied for refugee status remain in designated refugee camps
“until the processing of their status is concluded.” There are over 50,000
non-camp based refugees living in Kenya’s capital, Nairobi, according to UNHCR.
A Court of Appeals will, within 30 days, rule on the
constitutionality of 22 sections of the bill, which are being challenged by the
Kenya National Human Rights Commission (KNHRC) and the opposition Coalition for
Reforms and Democracy (CORD).
The Security Amendment Act was passed on 18 December after a
heated debate in parliament that culminated in a fistfight among members of the
lower house. It was signed into law by the President the following day.
It took less than two weeks to draft and pass the law following
a spate of terror attacks conducted by Somali terrorist group, Al-Shabab in
Kenya. On 2 December, 36 people were gunned down by al-Shabab in a quarry close
to Mandera town, an area close to the Kenya-Somalia border. Ten days earlier,
less than 50 kilometers away, 28 bus passengers had been shot by the group.
Kenya has suffered more than 50 gun, grenade or improvised
explosive device (IED) attacks since 2011, when it began its military operation
against Al-Shabab in Somalia.
Somali refugees disproportionately affected
Amnesty International argues that while the new law, if
enforced, would inevitably lead to refoulement, it could also be discriminatory
in its implementation.
“We’re very concerned about who will be targeted to be sent
back,” Michelle Kagari, Deputy Regional Director for East Africa at Amnesty
International, told IRIN. “We have been documenting that refugees, and Somali
refugees in particular, have been disproportionally targeted by the link
between refugees, terrorism and Kenya’s security operation in Somalia.”
UNHCR estimates that by the end of 2015, refugees and asylum
seekers from Somalia will represent nearly 70 percent of the people of concern
to UNHCR in Kenya.
Fears about the targeting of Somalis are echoed within the
Somali refugee community.
"We fled from Somalia because of terror-related problems
and here, where we thought it was a safe haven, is becoming another hell"
“The anti-terror law is mainly meant for Muslims, and the Somalis in particular,” Sheikh Mohamed Abdi, a Muslim cleric living in Dadaab, the largest complex of refugee camps in Kenya where the majority of refugees are Somali. “There is nowhere to run. We fled from Somalia because of terror-related problems and here, where we thought it was a safe haven, is becoming another hell.”
“The anti-terror law is mainly meant for Muslims, and the Somalis in particular,” Sheikh Mohamed Abdi, a Muslim cleric living in Dadaab, the largest complex of refugee camps in Kenya where the majority of refugees are Somali. “There is nowhere to run. We fled from Somalia because of terror-related problems and here, where we thought it was a safe haven, is becoming another hell.”
“There are some refugees who are not registered and staying in
the camp and so the police can arrest them, assume they are terrorists and hold
them for one year,” said Abdi Ahmed, the Section N chairman in Dadaab, and a
community leader. “The entire refugee community lives in panic.” Under the new
law, terror suspects can be held for up to one year without trial.
Even registered refugees fear the restrictions on movement that
the new law will formalize. “Getting a movement pass these days is very
difficult and for students, not having it means missing classes and sometimes
exams,” said a Dadaab youth leader, who wished to remain anonymous. He believed
that the law will make movement even harder.
The Security Amendment Act comes in the wake of a worsening
climate for refugees in Kenya. In April 2014, thousands of ethnic Somalis were
rounded up in Nairobi, and held at a sports stadium as part of an operation
dubbed Usalama Watch. Similar crackdowns have occurred across the country. Many
refugees who had been living in cities were sent to Dadaab.
Government defends law
Kenya’s Attorney General, Githu Muigai, has defended the new
law. In his response to the petition filed by the opposition party and various
human rights groups, through the Solicitor-General, he said that the discretion
accorded to parliament to temporarily increase the numbers of refugees allowed
to remain in the country would ensure that refoulement does not occur
He further argued that the laws were necessary to combat
terrorism. “We currently have forces in Somalia and it is important to note
that the country has been attacked several times. The law, as it is, enables
the security personnel to counter threats posed to Kenyans. The issue of life
is more important than anything else," said Muturi.
However, rights groups strongly rebutted this argument. “The
government needs to deal with security appropriately and do it in a way that
respects human rights. The two are not contradictory,” said Amnesty
International’s Kagari. “All three amendments are not only violating the spirit
of the constitution but also Kenya’s commitment under the refugee convention.”
Comments
Post a Comment