Skip to main content

[MigrantCause.com] AN OPEN LETTER TO THERESA MAY – I ASK THAT YOU RECONSIDER …

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO THERESA MAY – I ASK THAT YOU RECONSIDER …

by Viruben Nandakumar / 0 Comments / 194 View / 28/07/2015

Viruben Nandakumar

Dear Home Secretary,

As a liberal Conservative I am writing to express concern over the measures you have taken to bring immigration under control. I understand that immigration is an issue that is at the forefront of British politics. Nevertheless, it does not justify the following measures: deportation of asylum seekers, discrimination against foreign students, refusal to accept more than 187 Syrian refuges, and even the deportation of academics who contribute to British society. It is for these reasons and many more that I fear the road Britain is taking.

Tamils, Syrians and the story of Isa Muazu.

Speaking as a British Tamil, I expressed a great deal of pride and respect for the Prime Minister when he visited Jaffna and demanded an investigation into the allegations of war crimes. It illustrated that our government was willing to stand up for human rightsand take action when necessary. Sadly, this was greatly undermined by the deportation of Tamil asylum seekers within the UK. The advocacy group 'Freedom From Torture' has released a report which illustrates the ongoing torture which these asylum seekers face.

To my dismay, the deportation of asylum seekers revealed a contradiction in which Conservatives are willing to use a hollow veil of liberal rhetoric to garner support but often remain unwilling to act. This was again highlighted with the plight of Syrian refuges. Whilst the UK was willing to donate £700 million in humanitarian aid, it refused to take in more than 500 refuges. This is appalling considering the fact that, 'even smaller nations such as Norway, Sweden, Ireland and Finland have offered more places than Britain'.

Perhaps what is most striking and indicative of our immigration policy is the story of Isa Muazu.  Muazu came from Nigeria in 2007 on a visitor's visa which ran out in 2008, he was subsequently detained and attempted to apply for asylum. He claimed he was likely to be killed by Boko Haram, which he says has already killed members of his family. Out of fear and desperation he began a hunger strike which lasted over three months but the government consistently pushed for deportation and were in the end successful. Muazu preferred death over returning to Nigeria but the government reinforced the mantra that 'we must protect our borders' no matter the cost.

The contribution of immigrants.

As a firm believer in human rights, I viewed these actions as a cold and calculated attempt to drive down immigration. The more 'pragmatic' among us may argue that these people were a drain on society and it was in Britain's best interest to deport them. Whilst from a moral stance I find this despicable: I can acknowledge the reasoning behind it. Yet, my mind is baffled by your proposal that we deport foreign students as soon as they finish their degree and that we prevent them from working whilst studying.

Firstly, this move places poorer foreign student at a much greater disadvantage as they will be unable to support their studies through work. Furthermore, you are making it impossible for them to contribute back to society as they are unable to get work and must leave as soon as their course is over. This makes no sense! They graduate, not as unskilled migrants who scrounge off our benefits, but as high-achieving academics that make a positive and powerful contribution to society.

This lack of logic also follows the deportation of Miwa Hirono. Miwa Hirono was a lecturer at the University of Nottingham whose specialised knowledge of China made a great contribution to the university but also to the government as her policy recommendations helped to enhance our understanding of the country. Is your drive to cut immigration so strong that you are willing to deport immigrants who positively contribute to our country?  The fact is that migrants make an overwhelmingly positive impact rather than a negative one. Research has shown that European migrants alone have made a positive contribution of £4 billion between 1995 and 2011, furthermore 11 per cent of all staff and 26 per cent of doctors in the NHS are non-British.

So is immigration an issue?

To clarify, I understand that immigration must be controlled and that it has increased by 565,000 since 2011. An increased population means an increased pressure on housing, the NHS and the infrastructure of the UK. Maintaining a sustainable population is important and sadly this is compromised by our membership in the EU. Despite this, I must re-emphasise the positive contribution immigration has made.

High immigration, though not without its problems, does not justify the draconian measures taken that jeopardise not only the UK's moral standing, but also its economic prosperity. Your policy is a publicity stunt done to create the illusion that theConservatives are solving the immigration problem, but in actuality immigration is higher under the Conservatives than it was under Labour. I ask that you reconsider your policy and think about the country before your own party's welfare.

Yours Sincerely,

Viruben Nandakumar

 

Sources:

'Out of the Silence', Freedom from Torture report:

http://www.freedomfromtorture.org/sites/default/files/documents/Sri%20Lanka%20Ongoing%20Torture_Freedom%20from%20Torture_Final%20Nov_07_2011.pdf

'The two graphs that reveal the UK's abysmal record on Syrian refugees', Independent :

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-two-graphs-that-shows-the-uks-abysmal-record-on-syrian-refugees-10333028.html

'The case of Isa Muazu: A study in Barbarism', Huffington Post:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/matt-carr/isa-muazu-deportation-theresa-may_b_4369125.html

'Foreign students will be banned from working in the UK and forced to leave …',Independent:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/foreign-students-will-be-banned-from-working-in-the-uk-and-forced-to-leave-as-soon-as-they-finish-course-under-theresa-mays-tough-new-visa-rules-10385232.html

'Miwa Hirono: my Home Office hell', Times Higher Education:

https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/opinion/miwa-hirono-my-home-office-hell/2019275.article

'What have the immigrants ever done for us?', the Economist:

http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21631076-rather-lot-according-new-piece-research-what-have-immigrants-ever-done-us

'Figures show extent of NHS reliance on foreign nationals', the Guardian:

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jan/26/nhs-foreign-nationals-immigration-health-service

 

http://www.shoutoutuk.org/2015/07/28/open-letter-theresa-may-ask-reconsider/

 

__._,_.___

Posted by: Africa Realities <africarealities@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
http://www.migrantcause.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Migrants&#39; Cause Group
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a moderated e-mail discussion list.
=To subscribe, send an email to: MigrantCause-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
=To send a message, please send it to: MigrantCause@yahoogroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.migrantsingles.com
http://www.whichform.com
--------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[MigrantCause.com] Fwd: MAURITANIA: UN EXPERT WELCOMES NEW ANTI-SLAVERY LAW, SAYS EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT IS KEY

      Web version    New York  Aug 21 2015 1:00PM    UN News Centre with breaking news from the UN News Service  Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Slavery Urmila Bhoola. UN Photo/Jean-Marc Ferré (file) MAURITANIA: UN EXPERT WELCOMES NEW ANTI-SLAVERY LAW, SAYS EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT IS KEY While applauding the adoption of a new anti-slavery law in Mauritania that doubles, from 10 to 20 years, the maximum prison...

John Major praises 'guts and drive' of immigrants in the UK

John Major praises 'guts and drive' of immigrants in the UK Comments: Mr John Major  is right about migrants in the UK and worldwide. Most of  migrants  leave their countries as asylum seekers fleeing persecution, lack of freedom and human rights abuses. Other leave their countries just to look for new opportunities. Arriving in the new countries such as UK , they work hard to survive. In most cases they have left their families and relatives. They have to share their earnings with the people their left behind and to support the education of their relatives.  They live in disadvantageous situations because they  are not  in the same situation like the British people who  have families that  help them to set up a business for example, pay their education, help them to raise funding or to get a bank loan, to inherit houses and other assets. They face institutional discrimination because most of the...

[New post] Daily News and Updates from ReliefWeb 01/29/2016

Paul V Dudman posted: " OECD and UNHCR back increased refugee integration - World | ReliefWeb via ReliefWeb Headlines http://reliefweb.int/ tags: IFTTT Feedly ReliefWeb " Respond to this post by replying above this line New post on Refugee Archives @ UEL Daily New...