Skip to main content

UK targets to cut immigration 'punish businesses'

  • 1 hour ago
  •  
  • From the sectionUK
  •  
  • 64comments
UK Border controls sign at Heathrow Airport
Prime Minister David Cameron is "punishing businesses" by trying to fulfil promises to cut immigration, the Institute of Directors says.
It made its warning jointly with think tank British Future.
Figures due to be published on Thursday are expected to show net migration is more than three times higher than the government's target.
The Home Office says it remains committed to reducing the net total to the tens of thousands.
The Institute of Directors and British Future say radical policies to prevent migrants coming to the UK will damage the economy.
The two groups are calling for a "comprehensive immigration review" to establish what policies could be put in place to achieve the tens of thousands target, and what their impact would be on the UK's economy, culture and society.
They say the prime minister and Home Secretary Theresa May should ask an expert body, the Migration Advisory Committee, to set out plans for dealing with immigration and their likely impact.
These should then be put to the general public through town hall meetings across the country and a "citizens' jury" to reflect public opinion, the groups say.
David Cameron
Image captionThe prime minister vowed in 2011 to get net migration down to "tens of thousands" each year
Sunder Katwala, director of British Future, said: "The prime minister currently has no long-term plan to meet his net migration target. It is little wonder there is such low public trust on immigration and the government's ability to manage it.
"Responding to each damaging set of immigration figures with new ad-hoc policies is no way to manage such an important issue.
"A comprehensive immigration review would set out what's possible and what isn't. It could also give the public more of a say in what happens - providing impartial facts about the impacts of different policies on the economy, society and public services."
Simon Walker, director general of the Institute of Directors, said: "Scrabbling around to find measures to hit a bizarre and unachievable migration target is no way to give British businesses the stable environment they need.
"Combined with ministers' increasingly strong rhetoric on immigration, the UK's reputation as an open, competitive economy is under threat."
The prime minister vowed to get net migration down to "tens of thousands" each year "no ifs, no buts" in a speech in 2011.
But the most recent figures in May showed net migration in the UK stood at 318,000 in 2014.
Net migration chart
Speaking in February, immigration minister James Brokenshire said the government had been "blown off course by net migration from within the EU, which has more than doubled since 2010".
Measures introduced by the government to reduce net migration have included capping visas for skilled non-EU workers and introducing a minimum income threshold of £18,600 for anyone planning to sponsor a non-EU family member, such as a spouse, to come to the UK.
The government has targeted abuses of the student visa system by closing "bogus" colleges.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34070185

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[MigrantCause.com] Fwd: MAURITANIA: UN EXPERT WELCOMES NEW ANTI-SLAVERY LAW, SAYS EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT IS KEY

      Web version    New York  Aug 21 2015 1:00PM    UN News Centre with breaking news from the UN News Service  Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Slavery Urmila Bhoola. UN Photo/Jean-Marc Ferré (file) MAURITANIA: UN EXPERT WELCOMES NEW ANTI-SLAVERY LAW, SAYS EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT IS KEY While applauding the adoption of a new anti-slavery law in Mauritania that doubles, from 10 to 20 years, the maximum prison...

John Major praises 'guts and drive' of immigrants in the UK

John Major praises 'guts and drive' of immigrants in the UK Comments: Mr John Major  is right about migrants in the UK and worldwide. Most of  migrants  leave their countries as asylum seekers fleeing persecution, lack of freedom and human rights abuses. Other leave their countries just to look for new opportunities. Arriving in the new countries such as UK , they work hard to survive. In most cases they have left their families and relatives. They have to share their earnings with the people their left behind and to support the education of their relatives.  They live in disadvantageous situations because they  are not  in the same situation like the British people who  have families that  help them to set up a business for example, pay their education, help them to raise funding or to get a bank loan, to inherit houses and other assets. They face institutional discrimination because most of the...

[New post] Daily News and Updates from ReliefWeb 01/29/2016

Paul V Dudman posted: " OECD and UNHCR back increased refugee integration - World | ReliefWeb via ReliefWeb Headlines http://reliefweb.int/ tags: IFTTT Feedly ReliefWeb " Respond to this post by replying above this line New post on Refugee Archives @ UEL Daily New...